AR negative

These findings underscore the complex interplay between AR, TILs, and treatment response in breast cancer, highlighting the potential of personalized therapeutic approaches. Further research is warranted to elucidate the prognostic significance of AR and its implications for tailored treatment strategies in breast cancer management.

AR emerges as a promising marker in breast cancers, particularly in triple-negative cases. Larger-scale studies are warranted to comprehensively assess the relationship between AR expression and histopathological parameters, as well as other immunohistochemical markers.

AR expression may be related to good prognostic factors such as ER expression, PgR expression, and lower histologic grade. We also observed that AR expression did not have any association with the Ki67 proliferative index.

Such modifications limit cancer's resistance to oxidative damage, and thus its ability to utilise a higher redox homeostasis for metabolic advantage. The results demonstrate the ability of quantitative Raman spectroscopy to uncover, with full molecular-heterogeneity capture, mechanistic vulnerabilities in lowest-grade tumorigenic prostate cancer, thereby revealing underlying targets for disease disruption at early stage.

KDM5B-PGC1α is thus a potential therapeutic target for both androgen-sensitive and castration-resistant tumors. Meanwhile, PGC1α overexpression may serve as a useful prognosticator in those undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Combination therapy with enzalutamide and JH-RE-06 significantly suppresses cancer growth in a syngeneic murine tumor model over vehicle control or individual treatment groups. These findings suggest that AR inhibition broadly triggers DNA replication stress in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, thereby exposing a unique vulnerability that can be exploited by a TLS-disrupting adjuvant for targeted therapy.

CXCL8, in turn, activated the mTORC1 pathway, which increased de novo cholesterol synthesis by activating sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2 (SREBP2). Together, these results suggested that the CXCL8-mTORC1-SREBP2 axis contributed to the exacerbation of tumorigenicity in AR- PCa cells under androgen-ablative therapies.

We provide evidence that BCL2 expression is regulated by DNA methylation, associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and increased by the neuronal transcription factor ASCL1. Finally, BCL2 inhibition had antitumor activity in some, but not all, BCL2-positive PC models, highlighting the need for combination strategies to enhance tumor cell apoptosis and enrich response.

PFS was significantly lower in ERβ-negative group. Further exploratory studies on larger sample sizes are required to validate these findings in NMIBC patients.

Ex vivo and in vivo preclinical studies revealed that CU-PC01 PDX tumours are resistant to mCRPC standard-of-care treatments enzalutamide and docetaxel, mirroring the donor patient's treatment response. Furthermore, short-term CU-PC01 tumour explant cultures indicate this model is initially sensitive to PARP inhibition with olaparib. Thus, the CU-PC01 PDX model provides a valuable opportunity to study AR-negative mCRPC biology and to discover new treatment avenues for this hard-to-treat disease.

Overall, this study reveals that upregulation of NFIB, mediated by m6A modification, triggers EMT and metastasis in AR-negative CRPC. Targeting the m6A/NFIB axis is a potential prevention and treatment strategy for AR-negative CRPC metastasis.

Our study showed that GR played a role as a tumor suppressor gene in androgen receptor-negative prostate cancer cells via the GR-FOXO3a-GAS5 axis. Our results suggested patients with prostate cancer should be classified and develop a treatment plan according to the expression of AR and GR.