CDK4 mutation

We achieved a remarkable response in the metastatic lesions with minor toxicity issues. This case highlights the importance of utilizing up-to-date therapeutic agents and reactive decision-making during personalized cancer treatment.

No recurrence was observed during the follow-up period of 8 months. This study aims to improve our understanding of PF by analyzing the clinicopathological characteristics of this case, including immunohistochemical (IHC) and genetic examination, and reviewing relevant literature.

CDK4 high-level copy number increase coexists with other pathogenic mutations in AM. CDK4 appears to be a promising target for AM treatment and is expected to be combined with other targeted therapies.

Estrogen receptor one (ESR1) gene mutations, driving resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs), may guide the use of fulvestrant or emerging oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) like elacestrant. Targeting mutations like breast cancer gene 1 and 2 (BRCA 1/2) with Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway provides therapeutic options. The advent of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) like trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and novel agents targeting Trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) introduces further complexity, underscoring the need for early intervention targeting specific genomic alterations in metastatic BC.

For patients whose disease progressed on a prior CDK4/6i, we demonstrated comparable median TTFs for patients rechallenged with the same CDK4/6i (4.3 months, 95%CI 3.2-5.5) and with a different CDK4/6i (4.7 months, 95%CI 3.7-6.0) when compared to the recent PACE, PALMIRA, and MAINTAIN trials. Exploratory genomic analysis suggested that the presence of mutations known to confer CDK4/6i resistance, such as TP53 mutations, CDK4 amplifications, and RB1 or FAT1 loss of function mutations may be molecular biomarkers predictive of CDK4/6i retrial failure.

In sum, there is strong evidence that GBMs acquire novel mutations to survive outside the CNS. In some cases, tumor cells likely mutate after seeding scalp tissue during surgery, and in others, they mutate and spread without surgery. Future studies and genetic profiling of primary and metastatic lesions may help uncover the mechanisms of spread.

Our findings support that targeting PLK1 and PI3Kα with onvansertib and alpelisib, respectively, may be a promising strategy for patients with PIK3CA-mutant HR+ breast cancer failing ET + CDK4/6i therapies and warrant clinical evaluation.

THCQ and TP are not effective in patients with advanced PDAC harboring KRAS mutations or alterations in MAPK/CDKN2A/B.

P2, N=124, Recruiting, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology | Trial completion date: Oct 2024 --> Jan 2028 | Trial primary completion date: Oct 2024 --> Jan 2026

These findings suggest an alternative therapeutic strategy using sequential targeting of HRD in g BRCA- associated breast cancers through PARP inhibitors prior to CDK4/6i therapy to intercept deleterious RB1 -loss trajectories and thus suppress the emergence of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance. More broadly, our findings demonstrate how germline-somatic driven genomic configurations shape response to systemic therapy and can be exploited therapeutically as part of biomarker-directed clinical strategies.

Preliminary results of the MatchMel study revealed a variety of molecular mutations in WT melanoma pts. NF1 alterations appeared to be linked with Hi-TMB, which was associated with response to immunotherapy.

The primary endpoint is distant metastasis free survival and secondary endpoints are invasive disease-free survival, relapse-free survival, overall survival, safety and quality of life. Recruitment started in December 2023 in Belgium and is planned to open in 11 more countries in 2024: Cyprus, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.