FGFR4 mutation

We found that, consistent with other Fgfr4 knockout animal models, the fgfr4 mutant fish developed normally; however, homozygous fgfr4 mutant zebrafish were significantly smaller than wildtype fish at three months post fertilization. These fgfr4 knockout zebrafish lines are a valuable tool to study the role of FGFR4 in vertebrate development and its viability as a potential therapeutic target in pediatric and adult cancers, as well as other diseases.

This is the largest cohort present in the Literature of EOC PT and matched BM characterized with a multi-omics analysis. The intersection of LAMC3 and MYC target genes within the MET signalling network, a pathway recognized for bolstering cell motility, introduces a compelling avenue for future research.

Moreover, CXF-007 exhibited significant antitumor activity in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines and breast cancer cell lines through sustained inhibition of the FGFR4 signaling pathway. In summary, our study highlights a novel covalent FGFR4 inhibitor, CXF-007, which has the potential to overcome drug-induced FGFR4 mutations and might provide a new strategy for future anticancer drug discovery.

Furthermore, 8z displayed desirable microsomal stability and significant in vivo efficacy in the Huh7 HCC cancer xenograft model in nude mice. The study provides a promising new lead for anticancer drug discovery directed toward overcoming FGFR4 gatekeeper mutation mediated resistance in HCC patients.

Moreover, compound (S)-23 exhibited favorable pharmacokinetic properties, low potential for drug-drug interactions, and very potent antitumor activity in MFE-296 xenograft mouse models with a TGI of 99.1% at the dose of 10 mg/kg. These findings demonstrate that compound (S)-23 is a potential therapeutic agent for FGFR mutant tumors.

Further research is needed to explain differences in pathogenesis compared with other pNENs. In particular, multi-omics data such as RNASeq, methylation and whole genome sequencing could be informative.

Among hormone receptor-positive tumors, HER2-low tumors show less loss/deletion in 17q peaks than HER2-0 tumors. In this work, we reveal the heterogeneity of HER2-low breast cancers and emphasize the need for more precise stratification regarding hormone receptor status and molecular subtype.

Meanwhile, compound 27i exhibited potent antitumor potency (TGI: 83.0%, 40 mg/kg, BID) in Huh7 xenograft mouse models with no obvious toxicity observed. Overall, compound 27i was identified as a promising preclinical candidate for overcoming FGFR4 gatekeeper mutations for HCC treatment.

Efficacy studies were conducted in HCC xenograft models and mutant FGFR4-dependent xenograft models including a RMS PDX model harboring FGFR4 V550L mutation. ABSK012 demonstrated strong potency over multiple FGFR4 mutants that are insensitive to a first generation FGFR4 inhibitor BLU-554. ABSK012, presented here by Abbisko Therapeutics, is a highly potent, selective, and next-generation small molecule FGFR4 inhibitor overcoming FGFR4 mutations resistant to first-generation inhibitors. Its superior preclinical profile supports its fast-track development into clinic.

The IC50 of futibatinib was ~500 nM for RMS559 and ~10 μM for RH4. Western blot showed that futibatinib inhibited FGFR4 phosphorylation in a dose dependent manner. The kinome activity assay found that futibatinib treatment resulted in SFK, AKT, and IGF1R activation.

Patients progressed to erdafitinib (n = 14), futibatinib (n = 4) or pemigatinib (n = 3)...In patient-derived models, erdafitinib combined with pictilisib was synergic in the presence of PIK3CA E545K, while erdafitinib-gefitinib combination overcame bypass resistance mediated by EGFR activation.Conclusions We detected a high frequency of FGFR kinase domain mutations at progression to selective FGFR inhibitors in urothelial cancer. Unlike FGFR2-driven cholangiocarcinoma, polyclonality of FGFR3 kinase domain mutations does not seem to be a hallmark of FGFR-driven urothelial cancer. The identification of off-target events and the preclinical validation sustain the potential clinical applicability of combinatorial treatment strategies.

PI3K/mTOR dual inhibition, PI3Kalpha inhibitor, AKT inhibitor, FGFR inhibitor, ALK/IGF1R inhibitor, CDK4/6 inhibitor, BCl2 inhibitor, WEE1 inhibitor, ATR inhibitor, DNA-PK inhibitor, AT2AR inhibitor, Mcl-1 inhibitor, MEK1/2 inhibitor, EZH2 inhibitor, HDAC inhibitor, CDK9 inhibitor, DNMT3 inhibitor, BRD4/BET inhibitor, JAK2 inhibitor, CXCR4 inhibitor, FAK inhibitor, BTK inhibitor, eribulin, & VEGFR2/ PDGFR/FGFR or VEGFR2/c-MET/Axl triple blockage might be effective on TW2.6 and reverse treatment refractoriness, maybe through the inhibition of mesenchymal transformation, pRB, & PI3K/AKT /mTOR signaling and the modulation of stemness & PD1/PDL1 pathway...All cell lines will be tried to be categorized as TCGA subtypes for the reference of future drug combinations.Cell linesSCC25KBSASCAL27FaDuSCC15SCC9SCC4TW2.6Differ- entiationWellPoorPoorPoorPoorWellWellWellWell, but rapidly replicated, with high hyper-diploidy & complex rearrangementsHPV statusHPV 16/18HPV18--HPV 16/18--HPV 6/11-EGFR statusMediumLowHighHighMediumHighLowMedium to highUnknownDocetaxel sensitivity+++++++++++++ to +++++-+Cisplatin sensitivity+++++++++++++- to +-- to +5-FU sensitivity+++++++++++-+ to ++-- to +Afatinib sensitivity+++- to +-+++++ to +++++++++-Polo-like kinase Inhibitor sensitivity+++++++++++++ to +++- to +-- to +VEGFR2 Inhibitor sensitivity----+++++--++PI3K/ mTOR inhibitorAll cell lines sensitiveCDK4/6 Inhibitor response+++- to ++++++ to +++++++++++++ to +++Western blotsWeak p-AKT & VEGF-A, mild PDL1 and BMI-1, Gli-1(+)Weak p-AKT, mild PDL1 and strong VEGF-A & BMI-1, p16(+)Moderate p-AKT & BMI-1, high PDL1, mild VEGF-AHigh p-AKT & VEGF-A, mild PDL1 & BMI-1High VEGF-A, moderate p-AKT & PDL1, weak BMI-1, Gli-1(+)Weak p-AKT & VEGF-A, mild PDL1 & BMI-1Weak p-AKT, VEGF-A, & BMI-1, moderate PDL1Moderate p-AKT & VEGF-A, strong BMI-1, mild PDL1, Gli-1(+)High p-AKT, PDL1, & VEGF-A and moderate BMI-1NGSCCND1 gain, CDKN2A deletion, FRG1 mutation, HGF mutation, p53 mutation, ATR mutation, SMO mutation, RUNX1T1 mutationSTK11 mutation, PDGFRA mutation, IGF1 mutation, BCOR mutation, EGFR mutation, NOTCH1 mutation, MET mutation, IKZF1 mutation, NFKB1 mutation, DPYD mutation, FGFR4 mutation, BRCA1 mutation, MSH2 mutation, DNMT3A mutationKRAS mutation, MDM2 mutation, TMB-H, AXIN1 loss, RAD51D mutation, NOTCH1/2 mutation, ERBB4 mutation, PALB2 mutation, p53 mutation, POLE mutation, CASP8 mutation, BRCA2 mutation, RNF43 mutation, LRP1B mutation, MET mutationCDKN2A deletion, EGFR amplification, SMAD4 mutation, TMB-H, LRP1B mutation, APC mutation, CASP8 mutation, CREBBP mutation, PIK3CG mutation, NRAS mutation, ABL1 mutation, FGF23 mutation, HGF mutation, ATRX mutation, p53 mutation, ERBB2 mutation, ROS1 mutation, EP300 mutation, NRAS mutation, CDKN1A mutation, KDM6A mutation, FLT4 mutationCCND1 gain, CDKN2A deletion, FLCN mutation, TMB-H, LRP1B mutation, SMAD4 loss, SF3B1 mutation, FAT1 mutation, VHL mutation, NOTCH3 mutation, EPHA5 mutation, p53 mutation, ERCC2 mutationCCND1 gain, EGFR amplification, SMO mutation, ATR mutation, FAT1 loss, NTRK1 mutation, KMT2D mutation, p53 mutation, NOTCH3 mutationCDKN2A deletion, AXIN2 amplification, SMAD3 loss, HRAS mutation, ATR mutation, NF1 mutation. IGF1R mutation, FLCN mutation, KEAP1 mutation, ASXL1 mutation, PMS2 mutationCCND1 gain, NF1 loss, LRP1B mutation, NSD1 mutation, KMT2D mutation, p53 mutation, EPHA2 mutationFAT1 loss, CCND3/FGF10 amplification, PIK3CA H1047R mutation, STK11 mutation, RICTOR/FLCN amplification, VEGF-A amplification , TSC2 mutation, EPHB1 mutation, MAP2K4 mutation, KDM5A mutation, PDGFRB mutation, SETD2 mutation, RPTOR mutation, APC mutation, DDR2 mutation, ATM mutation, MDM2 mutation, p53 mutation, CDK12 mutation, HRAS mutation, MYC mutation, CDK8 mutation, ARID1B lossOutcomesBest; like TCGA CL (HPV+) subtypeLike TCGA basal subtype, but responded to particular treatments eachBasalBasalLike TCGA mesen-chymal subtype (HPV+)Like TCGA CL(HPV-) subtype, different characters between these 3 cell linesCL(HPV-) subtypeCL(HPV-) subtypeWorse; like TCGA EMT subtype (HPV-)Potential treatmentsAll sensitive maybe; Hedgehog inhibitor , HGF/c-MET inhibitor, and I/O could be tried(1) Taxane, cisplatin, PLKi (2) mTORi (3) IGF1Ri, METi, PDGFRi, FGFRi (4) Epigenetics (5) I/O(1) Taxane, cisplatin, 5-FU, PLKi (2) CDK4/6i (3) I/O (4) DDRi (5) KRASi, METi, HERi (6) p53 reactivator and MDM2/Mcl-1 inhibitor(1) Taxane, cisplatin, 5-FU, PLKi (2) CDK4/6i (3) Mild EGFRi response (4) I/O (5) NRASi, FGFRi, HGF/c-METi/ROS1i/HERi (6) p53 reactivator/DDRi/Epigenetics(1) Cisplatin, 5-FU (2) EGFRi and VEGFR2i (3) Weak to PLKi & CDK4/6i (4) I/O (5) mTORi (6) Ephi (7) DDR/Epigenetics (8) p53 reactivator (9) HIFi(1) Taxane and PLKi (2) EGFRi, VEGFR2i, CDK4/6i (3) NTRKi (4) Hedgehog inhibitor (5) DDRi, epigenetics,& p53 reactivator(1) Taxane &5-FU (2) EGFRi (3) HRASi (4) DDRi/Epigenetics (5) I/O (6) IGF1Ri (7) mTORi(1) EGFRi (2) CDK4/6i (3) I/O (4) Epigenetics (5) Ephi (6) p53 reactivator(1) CDK4/6 inhibitor (2) Multi-targeted VEGFR TKI (3) PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitor (4) ICIs combination (5) p53 reactivator/ DDR interventions/Epigenetics (6) Dasatinib, HRASi, EphB1/B4 interventions Further NGS analysis may translate these HNSCC cell lines to represent TCGA subtypes for the reference of future drug combinations, esp... Further NGS analysis may translate these HNSCC cell lines to represent TCGA subtypes for the reference of future drug combinations, esp. immunotherapy, basic/translational research, and animal models. LRP1B will be a potential ICIs efficacy biomarker in HNSCC.