KIT exon 17 mutation

Among PDGFR inhibitors, avapritinib has garnered attention due to its selective activity against mutant forms of PDGFR, particularly PDGFRA D842V and KIT exon 17 D816V, linked to resistance against conventional tyrosine kinase inhibitors...Our study exemplifies the potential of Machine Learning in the drug discovery process, providing a more efficient and cost-effective means of identifying promising drug candidates for NSCLC treatment. The success of this approach in preselecting compounds with potent PDGFRA inhibitory potential highlights its significance in advancing personalized and targeted therapies for cancer treatment.

In this updated exploratory analysis from INTRIGUE, OS was longer for ripretinib vs sunitinib for pts with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations identified by baseline ctDNA. The safety profile was consistent and more favorable for ripretinib vs sunitinib in these pts. Previously presented at the 2024 ESMO Sarcoma and Rare Cancers Congress.

Objective: Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who received prior treatment with 3 or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. In this updated exploratory analysis from INTRIGUE, OS was longer for ripretinib vs sunitinib for patients with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations identified by baseline ctDNA. The safety profile was consistent and more favorable for ripretinib vs sunitinib in these patients. Previously presented at the 2024 ESMO Sarcoma and Rare Cancers Congress.

55% (42/77) of liquid samples with a KIT -driver mutation had a co-occurring imatinib-resistant alteration, and a minority of cases harbored non- KIT mechanisms of resistance such as FGFR2 fusion, BRAF or EGFR alterations... Known driver and TKI-resistant mutations are identified in liquid biopsies of patients with GIST, with high concordance to tissue in the presence of elevated TF. Liquid biopsy may be valuable in the molecular classification of GIST during the medical management of advanced disease.

In this updated exploratory analysis from INTRIGUE, OS was longer for ripretinib vs sunitinib for pts with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations identified by baseline ctDNA. The safety profile was favorable for pts with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations in the ripretinib arm.

Not available.

Exploratory baseline circulating tumor DNA analysis from the second-line INTRIGUE trial determined that patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib harboring primary KIT exon 11 mutations and secondary resistance mutations restricted to KIT exons 17/18 had greater clinical benefit with ripretinib versus sunitinib. We describe the rationale and design of INSIGHT (NCT05734105), an ongoing Phase III open-label study of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib exclusively harboring KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations detected by circulating tumor DNA.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05734105 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

In this updated exploratory analysis from INTRIGUE, OS was longer for ripretinib vs sunitinib for pts with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations identified by baseline ctDNA. The safety profile was consistent and more favorable for ripretinib vs sunitinib in these pts.

INTRIGUE was an open-label, phase 3 study in adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib and who were randomized to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or sunitinib 50 mg. The results of this exploratory analysis suggest ctDNA sequencing may improve the prediction of the efficacy of single-drug therapies and support further evaluation of ripretinib in patients with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673501.

For all patients in our cohort, age > 60 years, KITD816 mutations and BCOR mutations were showed to be independent unfavorable predictors for OS and EFS. Our results revealed that SM-t(8;21) AML shared more similar clinical characteristics, molecular features and clinical outcomes with KITD816 t(8;21) AML.

2 patients did not achieve continuous RUNX1: : RUNX1T1 negative after preemptive therapy with Decitabine (DAC) and donor lymph infusion (DLI), and then was treated with Avapritinib, one's RUNX1: : RUNX1T1 fusion achieved continuously negative after 1 month treatment of Avapritinib, the other's achieved continuous negative after 7 months treatment of Avapritinib. Avapritinib is safe and effective in the prophylactic and preemptive treatment of AML with KIT mutation after allo-HSCT in children, which provides a clinical drug for the prevention of relapse after transplantation.

Avapritinib showed greater antitumor activity in patients with GISTs harboring KIT ALposABPneg mutations versus KIT OTHERS, and may be considered in the former subpopulation. Patients with KIT exon 9 mutations may also benefit in ³4 line settings.