^
16d
From Detection to Delay: Real-World Gaps in Post-Cologuard® Colonoscopy Adherence. (PubMed, J Gastrointest Cancer)
The study found poor follow-up adherence, with only 44% completing colonoscopy and a high false positive rate with just 38.5% of positive Cologuard® results showing significant lesions. These findings emphasize the need for better patient education, streamlined care pathways, and improved communication to enhance follow-up compliance.
Retrospective data • Journal • Real-world evidence
|
Cologuard®
1m
Head to Head Pilot Trial of Mailed Cologuard to Mailed FIT (clinicaltrials.gov)
P=N/A, N=100, Active, not recruiting, University of California, San Diego | Trial completion date: Apr 2025 --> Dec 2025
Trial completion date • HEOR • Head-to-Head
|
Cologuard®
1m
Exact Sciences Presents New Findings at ACG 2025 Demonstrating How the Cologuard Test Helps Improve Adherence and Close Screening Gaps (Exact Sciences Press Release)
''Exact Sciences Corp...today announced new data being presented at the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) Annual Scientific Meeting, taking place October 24–29, 2025, at the Phoenix Convention Center in Phoenix, Arizona. The company’s research showcases leadership in advancing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening through high-quality science, real-world evidence, and innovations that improve screening adherence and access across diverse patient populations.''
Clinical data
|
Cologuard Plus™ • Cologuard®
2ms
Improving colorectal cancer screening through Cologuard education: a quality improvement initiative in an urban primary care clinic. (PubMed, BMJ Open Qual)
This project demonstrates that practical, multifaceted, low-cost strategies of provider-focused education and patient-directed digital outreach can significantly improve Cologuard usage, ultimately leading to an increase in CRC screening completion rates. Sustained reinforcement and improvement in kit return will be a key to future improvements.
Journal
|
Cologuard®
2ms
Voyage: Real-World Impact of the Multi-target Stool DNA Test on CRC Screening and Mortality (clinicaltrials.gov)
P=N/A, N=150000, Active, not recruiting, Exact Sciences Corporation | Trial completion date: Dec 2029 --> Dec 2025
Trial completion date • Real-world evidence
|
Cologuard®
3ms
Head to Head Trial of Mailed Cologuard to Mailed FIT (clinicaltrials.gov)
P=N/A, N=400, Enrolling by invitation, University of California, San Diego | Trial completion date: Jun 2027 --> Sep 2027 | Initiation date: Jun 2025 --> Sep 2025 | Trial primary completion date: Jun 2026 --> Sep 2026
Trial completion date • Trial initiation date • Trial primary completion date • HEOR • Head-to-Head
|
Cologuard®
4ms
Colonoscopy Outreach for Rural Communities Aim 2 (clinicaltrials.gov)
P=N/A, N=527, Completed, University of Washington | Active, not recruiting --> Completed
Trial completion
|
Cologuard®
4ms
Effectiveness and cost of implementing a patient navigation program to increase colorectal cancer screening in a large federally qualified health center. (PubMed, Cancer)
The PN program, which used reminder texts and calls, alongside mass mailings of stool kits, increased kit returns over the implementation period.
Journal
|
Cologuard®
4ms
CARES: Community Collaboration to Advance Racial/Ethnic Equity in CRC Screening (clinicaltrials.gov)
P=N/A, N=5255, Active, not recruiting, Massachusetts General Hospital | Trial completion date: Jun 2025 --> Sep 2025 | Trial primary completion date: Jun 2024 --> Dec 2024
Trial completion date • Trial primary completion date
|
Cologuard®
5ms
The Role of UGI Endoscopy in the Workup of Patients With a Positive Cologuard Test in an Appalachian Population. (PubMed, Am Surg)
28% had positive findings on both upper and lower endoscopy and 6% had normal upper and lower endoscopy.ConclusionThis study suggests that UGI endoscopy may be a beneficial component of the workup for positive Cologuard tests in certain high-risk populations. This practice could identify significant pathology and improve early detection of conditions like peptic ulcers and early cancers, thereby enhancing patient outcomes.
Journal
|
Cologuard®
5ms
Cost-effectiveness of novel noninvasive screening tests for colorectal neoplasia. (PubMed, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol)
FIT was the most cost-effective strategy for preventing CRC cases and deaths. At real-world adherence of 60%, mt-sRNA demonstrated the greatest clinical benefit and was more cost-effective than other molecular strategies.
Journal • HEOR • Cost-effectiveness
|
ColoSense™ • Cologuard Plus™ • Cologuard®
7ms
Diagnostic value of genetic and epigenetic biomarker panels for colorectal cancer detection: a systematic review. (PubMed, Int J Colorectal Dis)
High-performance, candidate ctDNA biomarker panels with exceptional diagnostic accuracy for both CRC and APL have been identified. Further work should focus on the development of large-scale studies to justify their clinical implementation.
Review • Journal
|
KRAS (KRAS proto-oncogene GTPase) • SFRP1 (Secreted frizzled related protein 1) • SDC2 (Syndecan 2) • SEPTIN9 (Septin 9)
|
TP53 mutation • KRAS mutation
|
Cologuard®